GYMNASTICS HIGH SCHOOL CLARIFICATIONS
The following situations and clarifications are applicable to the current High School rules. Please forward these to any officials that are involved with high school judging| 1. | If a girl performed a handstand at the end of the beam, landed on 1 foot, swung her free leg forward and back in one continuous motion into a front salto, would this be a tumbling pass? | I would wonder about a continuous motion when she's descending one direction and throwing a front salto in the other, so I would just have to say that it is possible. | |
| 2. | Where in the book does it specifically say a gymnast can do an element 2 times separately performed in the exact same way, and the 3rd time it does not receive difficulty value? | On p. 14, Rule 4-2-2A - the indented list just above B Event Requirements "A difficulty is performed a third time... No credit | |
| 3. | On bars, at what point can a gymnast perform an uprise to get a HS? | It must come from a long hang position. | |
| For instance, does she need to uprise to clear horizontal (is this the attainable height?), and then if it is followed by a back hip: would that be an acceptable HS - or can the back swing be lower to a back hip to get HS? | The rule is clear that the HS uprise must come from a long hang to a clear support, so she has to show the clear support before she lowers to a back hip circle. | ||
| 4. | On bars, if a girl performs 2 long hang kips in a row, is there any deduction for a very small cast (push away) between the elements? Is there any expected degrees of cast for deductions on elements throughout the routine? | No specific standard, but I would guess the judges would deduct at least 0.1 for a push away without showing some amplitude towards horizontal on the cast. | |
| 5. | A gymnast performed a front tuck 1.5 into dive roll on floor, and wondered if this move was "legal". | That skill is illegal because we void saltos that do not have a feet-first landing. | |
| The skill is void, but the routine is still ok? | The routine is legal, but the skill is void. I would assume the judges would make certain everyone in the state realized the skill is not legal so it is taken from any and all routines. |